Apple's guidance: in six months there will be a new set of worries
Office Hours Research #2026FQ3 #Q&A · 4 comments
by Horace Dediu

An Office Hours question asked by Joseph B., July 31, 2026.
Q: What's up with the guidance? And why does this seem to be news to Mr. Market?
Start by not getting emotional about this, because I've seen so many times mispricing of Apple. But the market, as they say, is always right. It is simply the voting of a lot of people, and what it determines is the market price. It doesn't determine right or wrong, it just says that's what the market thinks.
The thing about the last few weeks, or even months, has been that Apple's been caught in a debate about whether AI is going to pay off or not. It was used by a lot of people who wanted to rotate out of AI names into something safe, and Apple seemed to be that choice. Apple never wanted to be chosen as a safe harbor. Management doesn't have that as their KPI, or in their plans, or in the product pipeline.
So strange things happen. It was unexplainable to me why the stock went up as it did in many days over the last few weeks. It was good and I felt it was fair. If it had been trading at 50 P/E, I would have been getting a little bit nervous, thinking it's maybe not justifiable. But there are many companies trading at hundreds of P/E, and who's to say that's wrong?
It seemed to have run ahead of itself a little bit. But on the other hand, the reaction is completely unwarranted if it's based on what Apple reported. Apple reported a very strong quarter. It reported some circumstances that are unusual. Foreign exchange is one. The struggle with getting supply is another. By the way, nobody seems to talk about memory anymore. Nobody seems to talk about the fact that we've seen price increases, which was just a month ago. It's all now that Apple is constrained, for other reasons. In six months we'll totally forget about this, and there'll be a new set of worries.
Fundamentally, the company is doing very well. I think it is entering a cyclical period of above-average growth. It might be because products are getting a little bit old in people's hands. It might be that demand will truly pull forward a lot of new consumption, but it's constrained by being able to deliver. Again, not the first time.
It's surprising to me how volatile, though — to see a 10% drop in one day, including after hours. I don't recall there being that much movement even in the times of Steve Jobs, when we did have huge volatility. But perhaps my memory's weak. On fundamentals alone: the next quarter, which isn't even a holiday quarter, growing 10% — as a disappointment? It'll re-accelerate.
Editor's Note: This was one of the questions asked by participants in Asymco's July 2026 Office Hours live Q&A session, held the day after Apple's FQ3 2026 earnings and open to Asymco One subscribers.
Subscribe to Asymco One for full access to this and other content.
4 comments
FredHS ·
Apple guided 9 to 11% growth for the quarter we're in right now. Assuming they sandbagged a bit for Ternus's first report, think 10% to 12%, or double digits. It just sounds better. No big deal.
Sacto Joe ·
Thanks for the answer, Horace.
I think you’re right about this time being different, if for no other reason than seeing a 10% drop outside of open market hours.
Check out the month’s detailed chart, while it’s still available, because it’s not the only non-open market anomaly: A sinstantial upwards surge EOD July 14th, then a gradual drift down, then a second substantial upwards surge EOD July 23. then a substantial lift into the new ATH, a return to a 40+ P/E ratio, a $5+ T market cap and a return to the #1 market cap, then a non-open market drop from about $338 to about $331 on July 29th, then a slight recovery back to about $334 on Thursday, March 30th, and then, literally as the Apple earnings were published and long before Apple’s earnings call, the overnight selloff, and when only a few traders/investors are actually able to buy and sell AAPL (because you have to have set that up beforehand), and consequently when very few trades relative to the open market can determine “valuation” on the opening bell, AAPL stock loses HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS OF DOLLARS of value literally overnight.
It’s called the Apple Slingshot (although I’m sure it’s being practiced on other companies), and it’s a total scam that probably sees a fair amount of collusion (that of course is completely ignored by government agencies, especially these days) and ought to have been outlawed long, long ago.
But as bad as it is, it’s nothing to how destructive it was pre-Apple buybacks, when Apple got into the game of taking it’s woefully undervalued stock out of its float for what is now seen as an embarrassingly low average price per split/adjusted share….
Sacto Joe ·
Hi, Fred. I know, I’m supposed to be concentrating on my patent application deadlines, so don’t tell on me…
It’s pretty in the bag that Apple’s going to yet again handily grow EPS both because of increased net income and buybacks, and that will continue to compress the valuation, which for some investors/traders will be a negative but really just means Apple will ha
Sacto Joe ·
sorry - hit post accidentally…
…have little reason to be called “overvalued”. In reality, of course, it’s undervalued yet again, but you have to be aware of the game to really know how it’s played and how to play it….